(Essay) Feminist Discourse: Gaian Concourse by Glenys Livingstone Ph.D.

This essay is an edited excerpt from Chapter 2 of the author’s book PaGaian Cosmology:Re-inventing Earth-based Goddess Religion

Art by Deborah Milton https://deborahmiltonartist.com

The focus of my work in the authoring of a PaGaian Cosmology has not been an exploration or statement of a difference between some concepts of “feminine” and “masculine”, or “female” and “male”. It is the development of a metaphor based in female bodily experience that is ubiquitous in natural phenomena such as all bodily cycles, the moon cycle, plant cycles, and the seasons. I do not spend time “dismantling a dualism based on difference” as feminist theorist Val Plumwood describes that task.[i] However, my work does conform to features that Val Plumwood  describes as required for “the reconstruction of relationship and identity in terms of a non-hierarchical concept of difference”[ii], and I do believe this work, in its social action –  its experiential concourse – does conform to Val Plumwood’s features of “appropriate relationship of non-hierarchical difference”[iii].

Val Plumwood outlines two common problems that the female may be entrapped by, in the formation of identity as a “post-colonial” group: that is, as a group that has been “colonised”, situated as “Other”, or “backgrounded” – however one chooses to term it. Those two common problems are identified as (i) the denial of difference and (ii) the reversal syndrome (where the dualism and hierarchical arrangement are accepted, and value is reversed: that is, everything “female” is better than everything “male”)[iv]. My work does neither of these things. Difference is specifically addressed on various occasions, in theory and in regard to the visceral impact of language; and in the academic version of PaGaian Cosmology[v] it is further addressed in the experiences of participants in the ceremonies where there are people identified as of both sexes participating fully. In regard to the latter problem of “reversal syndrome” as defined by Plumwood, the Female Metaphor developed in this work does not fall into this entrapment, as “the new identity” which is identification with the dynamics of all being, is not “specified in reaction to the coloniser … (or) in relation to him.”[vi] Also, (the new identity) has not accepted “the dualistic construction of identity.”[vii] Definition of the Female Metaphor is not “in relation to the master”[viii], as Val Plumwood defines the possible problem: the nature of the Self in the Metaphor of this work always has agency and is centred in cosmic source, even while it remains deeply related, connected in the web of life.

Sometimes expressions used by some participants in their responses seemed to indicate that some may still be caught in problems of “hierarchical difference”, but I perceive and accept this as a remnant or an individual interpretation and difference of understanding, which is part of a dualistic cultural heritage. This cannot be abolished in one swift move. It is true as Val Plumwood asserts in earlier writing[ix], that Gaian symbolism is not an automatic guarantee of change, but I believe that when such metaphor is approached in a ‘holarchical’ manner rather than with a concept of hierarchy, that the Gaian symbolism and story does have the innate capacity for participants to change. A sensuous identification of the dynamic self with the dynamic Earth and Cosmos, through female metaphor, may serve as a gateway for some to a larger self, even perhaps beyond the female metaphor.

References

Gross, Rita. “The Feminine Principle in Tibetan Vajrayana Buddhism.” The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. Vol.16 No.2,1984, pp.179 -182.

Livingstone, Glenys. PaGaian Cosmology:Re-inventing Earth-based Goddess Religion. NE: iUniverse, 2005.

Plumwood, Val.Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. NY: Routledge, 1993.

Art: “I Wish I Could” by Deborah Milton. Original is sold but reproductions and notecards are available:  deborahmltn@gmail.com.

Notes:

[i] Val Plumwood, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, p. 60.

[ii] Val Plumwood, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, p. 60.

[iii] Val Plumwood, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, p. 60.

[iv] Val Plumwood, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, p. 60-62.

[v] Glenys Livingstone, The Female Metaphor – Virgin, Mother, Crone – of the Dynamic Cosmological Unfolding: Her Embodiment in Seasonal Ritual as a Catalyst for Personal and Cultural Change, Western Sydney University 2002. https://www.academia.edu/27860395/The_female_metaphor_-_virgin_mother_crone_-_of_the_dynamic_cosmological_unfolding_her_embodiment_in_seasonal_ritual_as_a_catalyst_for_personal_and_cultural_change

[vi] Val Plumwood, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, p. 61.

[vii] Val Plumwood, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, p. 61. For a clear analysis of ways of dealing with “pairs”- in particular “feminine” and “masculine”, see Rita Gross “The Feminine Principle in Tibetan Vajrayana Buddhism: Reflections of a Buddhist Feminist”. She speaks of ”dyadic unity”, “hierarchical dualism” and “monolithic entity”.

[viii] Val Plumwood, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, p. 61.

[ix] Val Plumwood, “Gaia, Good for Women?” Refactory Girl.

Meet Mago Contributor Glenys Livingstone 


Get automatically notified for daily posts.

Leave a Reply to the main post