Part 3: Common Threads
Chang’an, like Constantinople, became “The” major metropolis during their empress’ reigns. Where Pulcheria built churches and hospices, Wu built the Daming Palace to showcase the power and majesty of the Tang Dynasty, pagodas for the people to worship in and granaries to feed them. In keeping with the Kuan Yin spirit of compassion for her subjects, the Empress established local granaries, not unlike Pulcheria’s “Steps”, that were insulated so that they could store rice for up to ten years, providing the populace with food in times of drought. So far upwards of 280 such granaries have been found in the former capital with archeologists suspecting there could be upwards of 500. During both women’s reign, life and status for women in their capitals noticeable improved. Both tried to create meritocracies, with Empress Wu starting the Imperial Exams, which were intended to identify the best qualified candidates for governmental offices rather than the previous system of heredity and nepotism. Under their leadership their empires flourished through trade as well as through conquest. They each were instrumental in strategic battles that increased the size of their territories. On the religious side, Pulcheria brought holy relics and jewels to Constantinople, while Wu commissioned, or had dedicated to her, Buddhist statues and paintings across her vast nation. Both were influential in the development of sacred texts for their respective faiths. Empress Pulcheria’s influence is apparent in the text that developed from the two Councils, and Empress Wu’s with the promotion of the Lotus Sutra as well as the “finding” of the Dayun Jing Sutra and the Treasury Rain Sutra. Empress Wu also influenced the gender change of the leading now-female deity in Chinese Buddhism, Kuan Yin.
A brief list of some of their similarities includes:
Empress Pulcheria and Empress Wu were the only truly long-standing ruling empresses for their respective cultures. They started out as co-rulers, but the main power was in their hands, and they continued to rule after the death of the emperor. Empress Wu was called “Emperor” when she was sole ruler from 690/691 to her abdication in 705.
Both lived part of their lives as nuns within their respective traditions. Pulcheria was a nun by dedication, Wu by necessity as all imperial concubines who had not birthed a child were sent to a convent after their Emperor died.
They were steeped in religious traditions that were not mainstream, and both spent their careers and lives promoting their faiths against what they believed to be heretical views.
They both chose deities of compassion to associate with and to publically model themselves on; in Pulcheria’s case spiritually and physically, in Wu Zetian’s materially.
They both used the deities to rally their soldiers in actual battles against enemies of their empires. Pulcheria and Theodosius II fought against the Persians and the victory was attributed to Pulcheria’s virginity as a sign of her association with the Virgin Mary, and Wu Zetian subdued a rebellious vassal state, Khitan, with the help of Buddhist and Taoist ceremonies and a specific public ceremony dedicated to Kuan Yin.
They both commissioned sacred images, artifacts, and worship sites to glorify their chosen divine figure, thereby promoting their personal as well as spiritual images.
They both established cults for their respective deities through the use of propaganda, and the creation of sacred texts and images.
They both had philanthropic systems in place to take care of the common people, including the distribution of food and health care resources.
The difference in their legacies is that the Roman Catholic Church made Pulcheria a saint for her efforts to promote the Virgin Mary, while Empress Wu had no such support. Primarily her ruthless acts within the Court and about those who opposed her will were transmitted to the future. It is only within the past few years, that archeologists and scholars are discovering another side to her story and to her reign and influence on bringing a feminine facet to Chinese Buddhism. In 2015 CCTV, the Chinese central television system, had a 96 part series on her trying to show a more human side of her story than earlier depictions had portrayed. Empress Wu is buried with her husband and her memorial stele remains blank. Her legacy is still unwritten. There is much more to be discovered about her influence on popularizing devotion to Kuan Yin and especially about her early foundational years in Taizong’s Court with Princess Wen Cheng.
Conclusion
The use of imperial power was instrumental in the establishment of the on-going devotion to sacred feminine figures of compassion in the Roman Catholic and Chinese Buddhist traditions. Empress Pulcheria and Empress Wu Zetian used their power to influence and change not only the political atmosphere they found themselves in, but also promoted the idea of a compassionate female “deity” that was an intercessor with heaven on behalf of the people. Both used this model in the public perception of themselves, while both were characterized as cut-throat to those who challenged them. Pulcheria has received better press from subsequent generations as she has been canonized by the Catholic Church. Empress Wu Zetian did not have such luck as the Confucian model of gender roles came back into force after her death. The records we have of her are all from men who were not necessarily in favor of a female ruler. Nonetheless, the development of devotion to Kuan Yin, can be attributed to her reign, as can the decisions about Mary at the Ecumenical Councils of Ephesus in 431 and Chalcedon in 451 to Empress Pulcheria. These two Empresses, the only female rulers from their long-standing empires, Byzantium and the Tang Dynasty, were instrumental in the development of devotion to sacred feminine compassionate figures, while at the same time promoting the well-being of the people of their empires.
(End of the Essay)
(Meet Mago Contributor) Krista Rodin, Ph.D.
References
Atanassova, A. (2010). Orthodox women’s defense of the Theotokos: The case of Empress Pulcheria and the Council of Ephesus. Retrieved fromhttp://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:11154
Baring, A., & Cashford, J. (1993). The myth of the goddess: Evolution of an image. London: Arkana Penguin Group.
Constas, N. P. (1995). Weaving the body of God: Proclus of Constantinople, the Theotokos, and the loom of the flesh. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 3(2), 172. Retrieved from http://muse.Jhu.edu/journals/earl/summary/v003/3.2constas.html
Ebrey, Patricia. (2011) “Cave Temples: Longmen.” Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/chinaciv/bud/5temcave.htm
Getty, A. (1988). The Gods of Northern Buddhism: Their history and iconography. London: Dover Publications.
Hahn, S. (2001). Hail, Holy Queen: The Mother of God in the Word of God. NY: Doubleday.
Justinian.
(2010) “The Nobleborn Empress Pulcheria” Codex
Justinianus. Retrieved from
Codexjustinianus.blogspot.com/2010/09/nobleborn-empress-pulcheria.html
Karcher, S. (2010). The Kuan Yin oracle. London: Piatkus.
Palmer, M., & Ramsay, J., & Kwok, M. H. (1995). Kuan Yin. Myths and prophecies of the Chinese goddess of compassion. San Francisco: Thorsons.
Pelikan, J. (1996). Mary through the centuries: Her place in the history of culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Qiang, N. (2003). Gender politics in medieval Chinese Buddhist art; images of Empress Wu at Longmen and Dunhuang. Oriental Art, 2, 31.
Roman Catholic Mariology. (2011). Pope Pius XII Mariology. Newnan, GA: Hephaestus Books.
Rothschild, N. H. (2006). An inquiry into reign era changes under Wu Zhao, China’s only female emperor. Early Medieval China, 12, 136.
Taranatha, J. N., & Templeman, D. (Ed. & Trans.). (2007). The origins of Tara Tantra. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.
Teetgen, A. B. (2010). The life and times of the Empress Pulcheria A.D. 399 A.D. – A.D. 452. Charleston, SC.: Nabu Press. Retrieved from http://en.calameo.com/books/000477687ed6b9f808e1f
Wong, D. (2007). Guanyin images in medieval China. Guanyin and modern society: Proceedings of the Fifth Chung-Hwa International Conference on Buddhism. Taipei: Dharma Drum Publ.
Yu, C. F. (2001). Kuan Yin: The Chinese transformation of Avalokiteshvara. NY:Columbia University Press.
All photos taken by the author.
Originally Published: “Journal of Literature and Art Studies,” November 2016, Vol. 6, No. 11,
Doi: 10.17265/215936/2016.11.001